Towards greener elections in India

The Election Commission of India (ECI) voiced its concern over the environmental risks associated with the use of non-biodegradable materials in elections. It has been urging parties and candidates to avoid the use of plastic or polythene for the preparation of election material during election campaign since 1999.

During the 2024 general elections, the Anandpur Sahib parliamentary constituency in Punjab is trying to create a model of green elections in the country. The constituency, located in Rupnagar (formerly Ropar), aims to turn the ECI’s slogan of holding 'Green Elections' into reality on the ground. To neutralise the carbon content generated during the election process, efforts are being made to plant the maximum number of trees and ensure the minimum use of plastic during the training, dispatch, and collection of EVMs by polling teams and at counting centres. In line with the ECI's concept of 'Green Elections', our slogan is to promote a free, fair, transparent, and environmentally friendly election process. To achieve this, political parties and candidates should be encouraged not to use single-use plastic, and government staff involved in election arrangements should be asked to participate in and act as ambassadors of this 'Green Election' campaign to further spread the initiative.

Green elections are practices that aim to reduce the environmental impact of electoral processes. They involve measures such as using recycled materials, promoting electronic voting, and encouraging candidates to adopt sustainable campaign practices.

Green elections aim to minimise the environmental impact of electoral processes by allowing candidates and parties to adopt sustainable alternatives such as recycled paper, biodegradable banners, and reusable materials. Opting for energy-efficient lighting, sound systems, and transportation during rallies can help reduce the carbon footprint. Leveraging digital platforms for campaigning (websites, social media, and email) reduces paper usage and energy consumption.

During the 2019 general election, the Kerala State Election Commission took a proactive step by urging political parties to avoid single-use plastic materials during their campaigns. Single-use plastic is a disposable material that can be used only once before it is either thrown away or recycled, like plastic bags, water bottles, soda bottles, straws, plastic plates, cups, most food packaging, and coffee stirrers. Subsequently, the Kerala High Court imposed a ban on flex and non-biodegradable materials in electioneering. As an alternative, wall graffiti and paper posters emerged, promoting a more sustainable approach. Additionally, government bodies collaborated with the district administration in Thiruvananthapuram to ensure a green election, emphasising eco-friendly practices. Training sessions were also conducted in villages for election workers to raise awareness and promote environmentally conscious behaviour.

Similarly, in 2022, the Goa State Biodiversity Board took a significant step by introducing eco-friendly election booths for the Assembly elections. These booths were constructed using biodegradable materials meticulously crafted by local traditional artisans from Sattari and Ponda. Not only are these materials environmentally friendly, but they also support local artisans.

Globally, Estonia laid the foundations for digital voting as an alternative to traditional paper-based methods. Their approach encouraged voter participation while significantly reducing the environmental impact. These examples demonstrate that prioritising environmental considerations in electoral processes can set an example for other nations and contribute to a more sustainable future. By implementing robust security measures, Estonia demonstrated that digital voting can be both eco-friendly and electorate friendly. The success of this approach suggests that other democracies can follow suit. These examples demonstrate that prioritising environmental considerations in electoral processes can set an example for other nations and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Traditional election processes have significant environmental consequences due to various factors, such as the emissions from campaign flights during elections, which contribute significantly to the overall carbon footprint. For example, in the 2016 US presidential elections, the emissions from just one candidate’s campaign flights were equivalent to the annual carbon footprint of 500 Americans.

Reliance on paper-based materials for ballots, campaign literature, and administrative documents leads to deforestation and energy-intensive production processes. Large-scale election rallies with loudspeakers, lighting, and other energy-consuming equipment contribute to energy consumption and emissions. PVC flex banners, hoardings, and disposable items used during campaigns add to waste generation and environmental impact.

Ensuring that all voters have fair access to new technologies is crucial. However, this requires substantial efforts in terms of training election officials and educating voters about the new systems. Election officials need to be proficient in operating and troubleshooting the new technology. Adequate training programmes are essential to bridging the knowledge gap. Ensuring that all voters, including those in remote or underserved areas, can access and use the technology is a challenge. Addressing disparities in internet connectivity and digital literacy is vital. Implementing eco-friendly materials and advanced technology often comes with significant upfront costs. Governments, especially those with limited budgets, may hesitate due to financial constraints. Allocating funds for technology upgrades while balancing other essential services is a delicate task. Prioritising modernisation within budget limitations is challenging. Although initial costs may be high, emphasising the long-term benefits (such as reduced paper usage and streamlined processes) can help justify the investment.

Traditionally, voting has been associated with a physical presence at polling booths. Overcoming cultural inertia and changing voter behaviour is essential for successful modernisation. Many voters view physically going to the polls as a sacred civic duty. Convincing them that digital alternatives are equally valid can be challenging. Building trust in electronic voting systems is critical. Public scepticism about security, privacy, and potential manipulation must be addressed through transparency and robust safeguards. Introducing new approaches, such as online voting or blockchain-based systems, raises concerns about vote security. Ensuring that voting systems are secure from cyber threats is paramount. Any compromise could undermine public trust and the integrity of elections. Striking the right balance between robust security measures and user-friendly interfaces is a challenge. Rigorous security protocols should not hinder ease of use.

This green transition must involve all stakeholders, such as political parties, election commissions, governments, voters, the media, and civil society. The success of integrating top-level directives with grassroots initiatives to foster a green transition is imperative. Political parties must take the lead. The journey can begin by enacting legislation mandating eco-friendly electoral practices, with the ECI incorporating them in the Model Code of Conduct. This involves campaigning through digital platforms or door-to-door campaigning (reducing energy-intensive public rallies) and encouraging the use of public transportation for election work. Incentivising the replacement of plastic and paper-based materials with sustainable local alternatives for polling booths, such as natural fabrics, recycled paper, and compostable plastics, will aid waste management and support local artisans. The ECI can push for digital voting even though this necessitates the training and capacity-building of officials. To ensure equal participation of all voters in the digital electoral process, the government must educate and support voters and ensure equitable access to digital technology.

This article is authored by Pradeep Singhvi, executive director, energy and climate change practice - Grant Thornton Bharat LLP and Sumit Kaushik, social impact consultant.